Mountains and glaciers are the world’s fragile water towers
- Editorial Team SDG6

- Oct 11
- 4 min read

Mountains do more than anchor horizons. By storing snow and ice, they act as planetary water towers, smoothing the pulse of rivers and releasing cool flows when lowlands need them most. The 2025 world water development report puts this plainly: as the cryosphere thins, water security wobbles, with consequences that ripple through drinking supplies, crops, power grids and ecosystems. Up to two billion people could feel the effects, and as much as 60% of global freshwater originates in mountain regions.
This is not an abstraction. Switzerland’s glaciers, meticulously measured each year, lost about 3% of their volume between October 2024 and September 2025, the fourth-largest annual retreat on record. The same warming that accelerates glacier retreat also destabilises slopes, a reality underlined by the Birch glacier collapse that buried parts of Blatten in May 2025. These events are harbingers for other high ranges where monitoring is sparse but warming is rapid.
Why melt matters for timing, not just totals
When seasonal snow arrives earlier as rain, and glaciers shrink, basins experience earlier melt peaks, flashier floods in wet months, then tighter shortages in dry seasons. Hydrologists call this peak water: melt contributions may briefly increase, then fall as the ice capital runs down. Managing that turning point requires knowing how much melt currently underwrites communities. In Nepal’s Khumbu, studies estimate meltwater supplies, on average, around 65% of pre-monsoon domestic water, with a reported range of 34 to 90%. Such numbers are not trivia, they are planning parameters.
The Andes case, where brittle hydrology meets rapid change
The tropical and subtropical Andes illustrate both dependence and exposure. A recent policy brief synthesises evidence that Andean glaciers are thinning at roughly 0.7 metres a year, about 35% faster than the global average, with modelled futures pointing to severe ice loss even under moderate emissions. In practical terms, that brittleness shows up in dry-season deficits. In parts of Bolivia’s Cordillera Real, glaciers have been estimated to provide about 27% of water during the dry months, a share that is neither trivial nor easily replaced by rainfall.
If hydrology is destiny, governance decides how fair or fragile that destiny becomes. Basin authorities across the Amazon–Andes corridor are now installing glacier and hydrometric stations to feed real-time data to managers, while regional bodies strengthen observatories to warn of tipping points. Development banks and research alliances have backed adaptation portfolios that range from efficient irrigation and small reservoirs to livelihood diversification and early-warning systems. None of this is glamorous, all of it is about reliability.
Hazards rising with the lakes
As ice pulls back, new proglacial lakes often form behind weak moraines. The risk of glacial lake outburst floods then climbs, threatening downstream towns, roads and hydropower. Risk maps and zoning rarely keep pace with these lakes’ growth. Switzerland’s Blatten episode is a rich-country reminder that fast-moving mass flows can overwhelm even well-resourced valleys. For many Himalayan and Andean settlements, evacuation routes are shorter, budgets thinner and the window for warnings tighter.
What would a serious response look like
Three tracks stand out. First, emissions cuts remain the only route to stabilise the ice ledger in the long run. Second, adaptation must be scaled with a bias to equity: measure the melt, price the risk, protect the vulnerable. That means funding local monitoring, restoring wetlands and high-altitude peatlands that buffer flows, investing in off-season storage and managed aquifer recharge, and upgrading rural water systems so losses are reduced before scarcity bites. Third, institutions need rules that are climate-literate, so water allocations reflect changing seasonality and hazard zoning reflects moving lakes. These are not silver bullets, they are the everyday mechanics of resilience.
As supplies fluctuate, politics hardens. Competing claims between irrigation districts, cities, hydropower and mining do not solve themselves. Transparent data and participatory allocation can lower the temperature, especially where Indigenous and rural communities are first to feel the pinch. One pragmatic test for any policy is whether it increases reliability for those most exposed. That aligns with SDG 6 on clean water, a goal that depends on turning cryosphere science into basin decisions.
Reasons for optimism, if action follows analysis
The machinery of adaptation is not starting from zero. Mountain observatories are expanding, early-warning systems are improving, and some river basins are stress-testing demand under future melt scenarios. The prize is a future where mountain headwaters still buffer climate shocks rather than amplify them, and where water sharing remains a social contract, not a scramble.



